dress white navy Unattributed “Uniforms–1899.” [US Navy] – Philadelphia Print Shop
SKU: 71872536334
dress white navy

dress white navy Unattributed “Uniforms–1899.” [US Navy] – Philadelphia Print Shop

Sale price$21.20 Regular price$23.56
Save 10%
Size: 4

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

dress white navy Unattributed “Uniforms–1899.” [US Navy] – Philadelphia Print ShopUniforms1899. [US Navy]. [Messman (Steward) Dress; Second Class Petty Officer (Gunners Mate) Dress; Seaman (Port Watch) Service; Third Class Petty Officer (Master at Arms) Shore duty Dress; Seaman (Starboard Watch) Jumper and Watch Cap; Enlisted Man (Seaman) Overcoat; Enlisted Man Rain Dress.]From The United States Army and Navy. Akron, Ohio: Werner Company, 1899. Approx. 9 1 4 x 13 1 4. Chromolithograph. Very good condition. A print from a series

“Uniforms–1899.”  [US Navy].  [Messman (Steward)-Dress; Second Class Petty Officer (Gunner’s Mate)-Dress; Seaman (Port Watch) Service; Third Class Petty Officer (Master-at-Arms) Shore-duty Dress; Seaman (Starboard Watch) Jumper and Watch Cap; Enlisted Man (Seaman) Overcoat; Enlisted Man Rain Dress.]From The United States Army and Navy

Akron, Ohio: Werner Company, 1899.  Approx.  9 1/4 x 13 1/4.  Chromolithograph.  Very good condition.           

A print from a series illustrating the history and the uniforms of the American Army and Navy, from the American Revolution to the Spanish American War.  Each print from this series captures in detail the various types of uniforms worn by each service and by rank and this image is no exception.  The prints were issued by the Werner Company of Akron, Ohio, and they were made with vivid chromolithography. 

Other images from The United States Army and Navy:

“Commander in Chief, Staff Officer, Colonel and Private First Continental Rhode Island Infantry – 1782-1796.”

“Commissioned Officers and Private of Cavalry – 1802-1810.”

“General and Staff Officers – 1812.”

“Infantry and General Officers – 1813-1821.”

"Frigate – 1815"

“General Officers – 1835.”

“Cavalry Charge of the 5th Regulars, Gains Mill – 1862.” 

“Colonel and Privates of Infantry Volunteers – 1864.”

“Generals – 1864.”

“Horse Artillery – 1865.”

“Cavalry Pursuing Indians – 1876.”

“General Toral's Surrender of Santiago to General Shafter – July 13th 1898.”

“U. S. Navy 1899”  [Second Class Battleship, Texas; First Class Battle Ship, Iowa; Torpedo Boat, Porter.]

“1st Class Battle Ships – 1899.”  [Indiana, Oregon, Massachusetts.]

“1st Class Cruisers – 1899.”  [New York & Brooklyn]

“Artillery Field Equipment – 1899.”

“Cavalry Field Equipment – 1899.”

"Infantry Field Equipment – 1899.”


Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 71872536334

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell dress white navy

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 998 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Abbi
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 4
4/5 Stars
Size: 4 Panel-88'', Color: Black
Very tall and easy to set up, the only thing I will say is that they do have large gaps in between, so you won't have 100% privacy unless you add a curtain in the back. Other than that, they are easy to fold, sturdy, and esy to assemble. The gaps are an easy fix so I would say they are worth it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Tyi Campbell
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Great product and worth the money.
Size: 4 Panel-88'', Color: Black
Portable and stable. Perfect size and gives me the privacy I need when working from home. Stability is great as long as you place the stands correctly it won't wobble. I love it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mona T.
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Attractive
Size: 4 Panel-88'', Color: Grey
The assembled product is just as described. The screens look great! I am using them to hide the cluttered shelving in my garage. The area now looks quite neat Something I must say, though, is that the assembly was extremely difficult. I had to use a silicone spray and some pounding to get the A and B poles to fit together. Also, it required a great deal of strength to stretch and hold the fabric panels so that the bars inserted in each hem lines up with the screws inserted in A/B poles. I strongly recommend having a partner to help with the assembly. while sc and screw into poles them once inserted intetchedtne end of each pole ( and B poles barely fit together. I used silicone spray on the end and then pounded them
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 12, 2025
K
Verified Purchase
karine
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Works
Size: 3 Panel-102'', Color: Beige, Size: 3 Panel-102'', Color: Beige
It’s beige and not white. Once install - hard to disinstall. Need a drill to put it together
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
ralversity
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 3
Does the job, but assembling by yourself is a nightmare
Size: 4 Panel-88'', Color: Black
Does it do the job? Yes, although as others said there are small gaps but it's not a huge deal. The price is also good. But the reason I'm giving it a 3/5 is simply because the assembly for this was a complete nightmare. I honestly don't think I would recommend this to anyone unless they have another person to help them assemble it, because doing it by myself was terrible. I don't think I'd buy this again, I think I'd opt to just spend a bit more money and save myself the trouble personally.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026

recommand products